Chelsea College of Arts 

Summer Show 2018

Screen Shot 2018-07-25 at 10.06.56.png
Screen Shot 2018-07-25 at 10.07.17.png
imageedit_27_2671051628.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

imageedit_46_3877601798.gif

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

imageedit_68_9394999016.gif

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

imageedit_85_7908632356.gif
imageedit_96_3101705309.gif
imageedit_98_8980154894.gif
Screen Shot 2018-08-05 at 17.29.34.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-05 at 17.29.34.png
Screen Shot 2018-07-31 at 18.46.42.png
Screen Shot 2018-07-31 at 18.46.42.png

Having only just taken down Wimbledon College of Arts own show at Lewisham Arthouse, on the 18th June I travelled to Chelsea College of Arts for their Summer Degree Show. The exhibition proved interesting, and I came away from it much the wiser with regard to how a show should, and indeed, should not, look. Although the quality of work was impressive, the layout of the exhibitions fell short of the mark in my opinion, as it was a somewhat sporadic arrangement which caused me a certain confusion. I also found it difficult to find information about the work presented and, therefore, much of the content below is my reaction and interpretation, without recourse to being informed.

 

It became difficult to identify which pieces of art belonged to the exhibition and those whose sole purpose was decorative or functional. I experienced this confusion a number of times – for example, when I was walking down a flight of stairs and came across an intricately decorated window. Roses and tulips, alongside an array of other flowers, had been painted on to the glass (Figs. 1 & 2), winding around the sill and window panes. At an initial glance, I thought the piece was decorative, especially as there was no name-tag or title in sight. However, afterwards, on exploring the show online, I found that it was, in fact, the work of an MA student. 

 

I went in search of inspiration and knowledge of course, but was particularly drawn to works which I deemed could be connected in some way with my own art. The first theme that comes to mind, and most obvious for me, was memento mori. Although distancing themselves from the traditional notion of painting, the installations I saw focused around items which are commonplace in classic memento mori works. One such installation comprised of twenty-four vases filled with wilting and decaying flowers (Fig. 3), and, the second, a series of chairs and tables covered in burning candles (Fig. 4). Although there was not a skull, glass, clock, or decaying piece of fruit in sight, the ephemerality was obvious. 

 

A second theme that attracted my attention was work looking at the moral degradation in society. A subject long adopted by students of the arts, there was no shortage of paintings, drawings and sculptures which suggested that humanity is in a state of moral decay. One work by Irina Starkova (Fig. 5) questioned human agency and free will in a post digital age. Starkova’s work suggests that we are a mere product of our own social climate and the prejudices that we carry are entwined in the fabric of our existence. Starkova’s work further suggests that this inhibits us from making our own decisions and forming an original opinion. A similarly depressing notion is put forward by one unidentified artist in the show whose exhibition entitled, Les Yeux Sont le Miroir de l’ame (the piece consists of a series of contact lenses in varying stages of dryness and decay) brings into question the false images that individuals in society hide behind in order to conceal their inner immorality (Fig. 6).

 

Other work which I found interesting included Mia Williamson’s, Ave Maria Sunday Delight (Fig. 7). One of her paintings contained characters which were animal-human hybrids. It led me to consider the ambiguity of personhood which exists around such hybrids and how this has been a phenomenon which draws back to the Medieval Period. I, myself, have, through painting and research, explored this same notion, looking at how Medieval artists and craftsmen created hybrids in order to dehumanize the ethnically diverse. Williamson’s work encourages discussion and invites one to consider the attributes necessary for personhood to be allocated.

 

Another piece which caught my eye was Pui Pui Debbie’s composition (a detail of which is found in Fig. 8). A student on Chelsea’s Graduate Diploma in Fine Art course, one is left wondering if Debbie’s previous degree was in English, as this would perhaps lead her to consider the use of words in society and how the meaning of many words is being reshaped. The use of the hashtag also asks the viewer to consider the role the internet plays in circulating and legitimizing new words and phrases. 

 

Ultimately, the Chelsea degree show offered a wonderful opportunity to see some very interesting and engaging pieces of work. It also provided an insight into how one might wish to install an art show, from the lighting of the room to the effective utilization of space. This knowledge is something I will take with me for my upcoming degree show this coming September.